AI is...
- A tool to enhance human capability.
- A support for operations and learning when used within district guardrails.
- A reality of the modern workforce that students and staff must learn to evaluate.
District Guidance Hub
Research, safety practices, educator guidance, student expectations, family resources, and approved-tool pathways for responsible AI use across the district.
Links
Starting point
Stakeholder Summary
Personalized tutoring, adaptive problem sequencing, dyslexia reading support, hybrid GenAI-adaptive programming feedback, and structured teacher assistance show credible gains.
Detection tools and LLM scoring systems can align with humans in aggregate while still shifting criteria, compressing scores, and disadvantaging learner groups.
Districts need approval pathways, privacy review, classroom-use guidance, audit routines, staff training, and model checks that evolve as tools change.
AI can reduce barriers, but unrestricted chatbot access can also create cognitive offloading, dependence, surface fluency, and a false sense of learning.
Safety
AI work in OCPS is anchored in human review, student-data protection, monitoring, and a formal review pathway for digital tools.
AI outputs must be reviewed for factual accuracy and representational harms. High-stakes decisions are made by staff.
Confidential data, sensitive student records, and PII may only be entered into tools approved for that data classification.
Staff use District-vetted, secure AI systems that do not use OCPS data to train public models.
Users do not have an expectation of privacy on District resources. AI activity may be monitored for compliance and safety.
AI may not be used for impersonation, harassment, copyright infringement, or exams unless the exam explicitly requires AI use.
The District makes professional learning focused on AI literacy, data privacy, and ethical integration available to staff.
AI safety and security
Tools are evaluated for contracts, data privacy, cybersecurity, system compatibility, educational value, filtering, and monitoring needs.
Software and AI Request Process
An instructional or operational need that does not duplicate software already approved.
Provide purpose, users, costs, and alignment.
Principal or administrator confirms need and funding.
District experts check instructional or operational fit.
Cybersecurity, compatibility, and data privacy are evaluated.
Terms are checked for FERPA, data use, public records, and intellectual property concerns.
Purchasing confirms value, pricing, and vendor eligibility.
Approved tools are added to the list; denied tools are blocked or redirected.
Taxonomy of scaffolded AI tools
Drafting templates, lesson ideas, summaries, examples, and teacher-facing planning support.
Adaptive reading tutors, problem sequencing, practice coaching, and AI-assisted feedback with educator review.
Pattern detection, student risk flagging, enrollment forecasting, and operational dashboards.
Resource suggestions, intervention supports, accessibility recommendations, and differentiated materials.
AI features inside search, productivity suites, writing tools, learning platforms, and approved software.
Systems that can plan, trigger steps, or act across tools. These require especially careful governance and monitoring.
Approved AI Software
These lists identify AI tools that have moved through district review for instructional fit, privacy, data use, and implementation needs.
Teachers and Staff
AI may support staff workflow, but educators remain responsible for verification, professional judgment, instructional quality, data privacy, and fairness.
Productive struggle
The summit is the learning goal—real understanding. Struggle is part of the climb; the wrong AI removes the climb entirely. Choose a trail and watch what happens.
Summit — the learning goal: real understanding
Base — the problem is assigned
High cognitive effort and high learning—but with a real risk of frustration and abandonment when a student gets stuck alone.
Each trail begins with the same problem. What changes is how much thinking the student must still do.
AI should not remove the cognitive work that builds durable learning. The goal is to lower barriers without skipping reasoning, drafting, revising, and explaining.
AI literacy
The knowledge, skills, and mindset necessary to understand how AI works, evaluate its outputs, and use AI tools responsibly.
Defining AI Literacy (opens in a new tab)Recognize AI, protect privacy, question outputs, and use tools only when authorized.
Use AI to support planning and feedback while keeping pedagogy and verification central.
Set governance, review data practices, and align tools to district goals.
Understand the difference between consumer AI and protected educational systems.
Tools and Workflows
Students
Students may use AI only when authorized by the instructor and must verify, disclose, and protect private information.
Before you use AI, run the PAUSE check. Select each card you can honestly answer yes to.
0 of 5 checks complete
Families
Your child's school uses protected educational systems that differ from consumer AI applications families may use at home.
Consumer AI tools may use data to train models or serve ads. Approved OCPS systems are reviewed for privacy, data use, and student protections.
Platform Examples
These larger sections are included on this page so the Google Sites embed works as a single self-contained resource.
Source-grounded analysis, citations, and suggested actions.
View Google NotebookLM sectionProtected youth-focused AI access and classroom guidance.
View Gemini Youth Experience sectionPrivacy, monitoring, safe search, and technical limits.
View Google Search AI Mode sectionNotebookLM shifts AI use from general answers to source-grounded analysis. It works from materials the user provides and keeps the source set visible during the work.
Unlike general chatbots, NotebookLM is organized around selected sources. That source boundary helps users compare claims, follow citations, and keep the work anchored to approved materials.
NotebookLM can summarize, compare, generate study supports, and suggest actions while keeping students and staff responsible for verification and final judgment.
Upload or select the materials that should ground the work.
Keep prompts tied to the documents and learning goal.
Review cited passages before using or sharing the output.
Use summaries, outlines, or study guides as supports, not substitutes for understanding.
The Gemini Youth Experience is designed for students under 18 with added safeguards, age-aware responses, and privacy protections that differ from consumer AI access.
Student use is connected to educational accounts and district-managed controls rather than general consumer access.
The experience should guide students toward questions, evidence, and explanation instead of replacing the thinking they need to do.
For submitted work, AI use must follow classroom or lesson guidelines with prior documented instructor approval.
Search has evolved. Google Search AI Mode is different from District-approved instructional AI platforms, so students and staff need clear expectations for privacy, monitoring, and verification.
Consumer AI experiences may use data differently. OCPS-managed student accounts and approved tools are reviewed for student privacy and district safeguards.
Students should use search results as starting points for verification and source evaluation, not as unchecked authority.
AI is not one thing. It is a collection of technologies that can recognize patterns, generate content, classify information, summarize sources, and support decisions when used with human review.
Computer systems designed to perform tasks that usually require human intelligence, such as language, perception, planning, or prediction.
A method where systems learn patterns from data instead of following only hand-written rules.
AI models trained on language patterns to predict and generate text, summaries, explanations, and other outputs.